Archived

Your News Talk America with Jake Smith. Welcome to the digital and interactive program.

To participate live by asking and voting on questions, chatting with viewers, and watching the show, got to RealNewsTalk.com and click the "Watch Here" button. You can view questions by clicking on the "Recent", "Popular", or "On Deck" buttons at the top of the left column.

To ask a question fill out the field on the left. You may vote on questions by pressing on the up and down arrow to the left of each question. You can watch the show in the middle and see current questions below the show window. You are the "Producers", ask questions and your votes count. There will be way more questions than time which makes voting important.

You can chat with other Producers and comment in the chat which is in the right column. You can keep notes by clicking the link to the right of your name in the upper right corner. If you asked your question in Mukana, and there is an issue with ti or we run out of time we will send your question back to your notes. Show notes will be posted on https://www.RealNewsTalk.com and the shows will be posted the following week.

10:10 AM ET

Segment Topic:

Jake and the Judge

• Pre-emptive pardons
• Birthright citizenship headed to the SCOTUS for the first time?
• The battle over Tick Tock and the First Amendment!
  • TikTok and the Freedom of Speech

       “Congress shall make no law ...

       abridging the freedom of speech

       or of the press…”

       --First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

       During the oral argument before the Supreme Court in the famous Pentagon Papers case, a fascinating colloquy took place between Justice William O. Douglas and the lawyer for the government. The case was about whether the government could prevent The New York Times and The Washington Post from publishing secret documents that demonstrated that American generals had been misleading President Lyndon Johnson and he had been lying to the American public during the Vietnam War.

       The documents had been stolen by Daniel Ellsberg, a civilian employee of the Department of Defense, in an act of great personal courage and constitutional fidelity, and then delivered to both newspapers. Two federal judges had enjoined the newspapers from publishing the documents, and the Supreme Court was hearing appeals by the newspapers.

       When Justice Douglas asked the government lawyer if the phrase “no law” in the First Amendment literally means no law, he was unable to answer. The court found his mumbo jumbo reasoning so telling that it actually published the transcript of the Q and A in the court’s opinion itself -- something it had not done before in modern times nor since.

       The court ruled in that landmark case that freedom of speech and the right to know what the government is doing and the right to consult whatever source one chooses when forming an opinion each trump the government’s concerns for protection of state secrets. Thus, it matters not how the media obtains information; if it is material to the public interest, the media may publish it, without fear of civil or criminal liability.

       The Pentagon Papers case was the high watermark for the freedom of speech: Freedom trumps safety. But the court studiously avoided answering Justice Douglas’ question about no law. If the Constitution means what it says, then no law literally means no law, and thus all sorts of legislation about speech -- from defamation to treason to silencing TikTok -- is unconstitutional. But if no law doesn’t really mean no law, then what does it mean?

       Regrettably, today, no law means whatever the court says it means. That’s what happened last week when the court upheld congressional legislation silencing TikTok.

       The legislation was based on Congress’ authority under the Commerce Clause to ban offensive products. Yet, rather than analyzing the legislation based on that, the court -- mouthing similar mumbo jumbo as the DoJ lawyer in the Pentagon Papers case -- ruled that if Congress decides that some commonly used instrument is detrimental to national security, then the court will not second guess Congress, even if this has the ancillary effect of abridging upon the freedom of speech.

       This ruling, which effectively overruled the Pentagon Papers case, turns First Amendment jurisprudence on its head.

       The courts have long recognized the freedom of speech as a natural human right. James Madison, who drafted the Constitution and wrote the First Amendment, understood that the right comes from our humanity. The First Amendment does not grant the freedom of speech; rather, it bars Congress from abridging it. Since the ratification of the 14th Amendment and subsequent judicial opinions, the prohibition upon interfering with speech restrains all levels of government -- federal, state and local -- and to all branches of government -- legislative, executive and judicial.

       Those of us who believe that the Constitution means what it says also recognize that the freedom of speech encompasses ancillary rights -- such as the right to silence, the right to read and gather information from whatever source one chooses, and the right to transmit free speech using whatever means one chooses. Under this Madisonian view of free speech, Congress can no more tell any person how and where to express an idea than it can tell any person what to read or not read.

       Yet the Supreme Court, whose principal job is to preserve personal liberty and private property from the reach of the government -- the judiciary in this respect is the anti-democratic branch of government -- utterly failed to do its job, bowing to undemonstrated congressional fears of Chinese Communist party officials hacking into the mobile devices of youthful TikTok users.

       People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.

       The greatest computer-hacking enterprise on the planet is the federal government’s own National Security Agency. That’s your friendly 60,000-person strong domestic spying apparatus, which unconstitutionally captures without search warrants every keystroke on every device and all data transmitted into, out of and within the United States. All of this is funded by the same Congress that will crush the free speech rights of adults because it fears foreign hacking of their children.

       Do you see what has happened here? The same government that cannot audit its own Department of Defense, that can’t balance its own budget, that can’t even deliver the mail is going to protect us from the Chinese -- even if free speech is impaired in the process!

       The legislation Congress enacted and that the Supreme Court upheld is profoundly at odds with basic American values. Among those values is that nothing trumps the freedom of speech. Without it, we cannot fulfill our aspirations as human beings or pursue happiness (remember that?).

       This week, President Donald Trump directed his Department of Justice not to enforce the TikTok ban for 75 days in the hope of some pro-free speech resolution.

       Doesn’t the Constitution mean what it says? Doesn’t no law mean no law? Isn’t the Constitution Madison gave us the supreme law of the land? The answer to all these questions is: YES. But the Constitution and its guarantees are only as vital as is the fidelity of the folks in whose hands we have reposed it for safekeeping.

       In that respect, we have failed miserably.

Panelist: 

Judge Andrew Napolitano, Senior Judicial Analyst, Newsmax and the Host of Judging Freedom podcast!

10:35 AM ET

Segment Topic:

• Woke Bishop: Episcopal Bishop is NOT the only one!
  • Remember the controversy over President Donald Trump’s visit to the St. John Paul II National Shrine highlighted a potential new development in the Catholic Church’s relationship with the presidency in the United States. Prominent voices, led by the local ordinary, Archbishop Wilton Gregory of Washington, D.C., thoughtthat the visit should have been canceled; moreover, that it was a betrayal of Catholic values not to have canceled it. (National Catholic Register)
  • Pope Francis has appointed Cardinal Robert McElroy, a vocal defender of migrants and critic of Donald Trump’s first administration, as the next archbishop of Washington, DC.
  • Cardinal McElroy, 70, is a strong supporter of Francis’ priorities on refugees, the environment and welcoming LGBTQ Catholics. He will succeed Cardinal Wilton Gregory, 77, who was the first African-American Archbishop of Washington, DC. (CNN 1/7/25)
  • Should Episcopal Bishop’s Diocese and Parishes lose their tax-exempt status? (The Johnson Amendment)

Panelist:

DIAL Producers

11:10 AM ET

Segment Topic:

On tomorrow’s digital, interactive Friday, we will present a very special segment: Has rolling up your sleeve led to American genocide?  What has the COVID vaccine done to America and the world?  We have doctors, authors and victims participating in this segment at 10:10 ET.

In preparation for tomorrow, I will rebroadcast Friday’s segment with Dr. James Thorp, M.D. author of Sacrifice: How the Deadliest Vaccine in History Targeted the Most Vulnerable.

Panelist:

(Rebroadcast from 1/17/25)

BIO: Dr. James Thorp, author of Sacrifice: How the Deadliest Vaccine in History Targeted the Most Vulnerable, is a board-certified obstetrician gynecologist (Ob/Gyn) and maternal fetal medicine physician with over forty-four years of obstetrical experience. He saw over 27,500 high-risk pregnancies in four and a half years while serving one of the largest Catholic Health Care systems, SSM Health, of St. Louis, MO. Dr. Thorp is currently the chief of Maternal and Prenatal Health at The Wellness Company.

He served as a reviewer for major medical journals, on the board of directors for the Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine, and as an examiner for the American Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology. He served in the US Air Force as an obstetrician gynecologist. Dr. Thorp testified in the US Senate under the Bush administration in 2003 and with Senator Ron Johnson and others in 2022.

Dr. Thorp is active in clinical research with approximately 275 publications of which seventy are COVID-19 related. He is a coauthor of The COVID-19 Vaccines & Beyond.

11:35 AM ET

Segment Topic:

Panelist:

Community Guidelines

Thank you for being part of the DTDMedia Community. We value our producers and encourage an active participation by having everyone ask questions vote and chat. In order to keep the DTD Media Community and this platform engaging and respectful to all members we request all commenters adhere to our guidelines.

Respectful Debate: We encourage a variety of opinions and open debate but please refrain from using threatening language or making direct threats. Civil discourse is key.

Accuracy and Ownership: Ensure that your contributions are either factual or clearly presented as your own opinions. Posts containing illegal, discriminatory, offensive or misleading content will not be tolerated."

Use Real Names: For a better and more respectful experience we encourage participants to use their real names rather than nicknames. People tend to be more considerate when their identity is known.

Language: Please use English when posting comments or questions as this is the primary language of our event.

Stay On Topic: Keep discussions relevant to the event topic. If you have a different topic in mind please wait for an appropriate session or thread."

Question Submission: When asking questions please use the designated questions field and select the appropriate category from the dropdown menu. Do not add comments in the question field; they will be removed. All comments should be posted in the chat section.

Be Respectful: Engage in discussions with kindness and respect for others. Differences in opinion should be addressed with civility to maintain a constructive environment.

Avoid Negativity: If you encounter negativity or hostile behavior consider your response carefully. Engaging in a positive and constructive manner helps foster a better community."

Moderation: We reserve the right to moderate and remove comments that are abusive, spammy, off-topic, or otherwise inappropriate. Even partial violations may result in the removal of a post.

Reporting Issues: If you notice inappropriate content please report it to our moderation team at the following email address: Event.Moderator@WGMD.com. Include a direct link or reference to the specific session or chat where the issue occurred. While we may not respond to all reports individually please know that your concerns are reviewed and taken seriously.

By following these guidelines you contribute to a positive and enjoyable experience for everyone. Thank you for your cooperation and for making this event a success!

Credits

Host
Jake Smith

Radio Director
Walt Palmer

Streaming Technical Director
Julia Hardy

 Real News Talk Logo Graphics
LED Pixels Light Effect
Storyblocks Asset ID: SBV-302248713