Your News Talk America with Jake Smith – 9/26/24 – No Video
Your News Talk America with Jake Smith. Welcome to the digital and interactive program.
To participate live by asking and voting on questions, chatting with viewers, and watching the show, got to RealNewsTalk.com and click the "Watch Here" button. You can view questions by clicking on the "Recent", "Popular", or "On Deck" buttons at the top of the left column.
To ask a question fill out the field on the left. You may vote on questions by pressing on the up and down arrow to the left of each question. You can watch the show in the middle and see current questions below the show window. You are the "Producers", ask questions and your votes count. There will be way more questions than time which makes voting important.
You can chat with other Producers and comment in the chat which is in the right column. You can keep notes by clicking the link to the right of your name in the upper right corner. If you asked your question in Mukana, and there is an issue with ti or we run out of time we will send your question back to your notes. Show notes will be posted on https://www.RealNewsTalk.com and the shows will be posted the following week.
10:10 AM ET
Panelist:
Jake and the Judge
Segment Topic:
A Brief History of Free Speech in America
“Congress shall make no law ... abridging
the freedom of speech, or of the press.”
--First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
When James Madison agreed to be the scrivener at the Constitutional Convention during the summer of 1787, he could not have known that just four years later he’d be the chair of the House of Representatives committee drafting the Bill of Rights.
In doing so, he insisted that the word “the” precede the phrase “freedom of speech” in what was to become the First Amendment, so as to reflect the views of the Framers that the freedom of speech preexisted the government.
Madison believed that pre-political rights, which he enumerated in the Bill of Rights, are natural to our humanity. Madison knew that when he wrote, “Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press,” he and the ratifiers meant no law. As direct and unambiguous as those words are -- the Constitution as amended is the supreme law of the land -- Congress and the courts have not always been faithful to them.
The first serious federal attack on free speech came in the Alien and Sedition Acts in 1798, which criminalized criticisms of the foreign policy of the federal government and the administration of President John Adams. The same generation -- in some cases, the same human beings -- that had ratified the First Amendment in 1791, a mere seven years later assaulted, defied and nullified it.
In response to the Alien and Sedition Acts, the two most prominent thinkers in America -- Thomas Jefferson, who had written the Declaration of Independence, and Madison -- secretly authored the Virginia and Kentucky resolutions, respectively. These state laws reflected the views of many ratifiers of the Constitution that the states that formed the federal government retained the power to correct it. All but one of the dreadful Alien and Sedition Acts were repealed by 1802.
During the War Between the States, President Abraham Lincoln arrested around 3,000 journalists and newspaper publishers in the North due to their harsh criticism of his government. He argued that the state of war gave him emergency powers to preserve the Union, which included evaluating and silencing the content of speech. Shortly after his death, the Supreme Court profoundly rejected his argument and set free those whom he had arrested, ruling that the Constitution admits of no emergency powers and free speech exists during war as well as peacetime.
At the height of the anti-immigrant hysteria whipped up by President Woodrow Wilson, Congress enacted the Espionage Act of 1917, which punished speech deemed harmful to America’s war efforts. Wilson was determined to win the First World War at the price of the suppression of ideas that he hated or feared.
He went so far as to arrest some of his former Princeton students for reciting “subversive materials” aloud outside a military draft office in Trenton, New Jersey, arguing that the First Amendment only restrained Congress, not the president. The materials they read aloud? The Declaration of Independence.
Then, a series of Supreme Court decisions instructed that if the government’s principal purpose or effect is to suppress speech because of its content, the suppression is unconstitutional. These opinions harkened back to Madison, who believed that the only moral and constitutional remedy for hateful or harmful or even seditious speech was not suppression and punishment but rather more speech.
A famous Chicago case put to rest the concept of freedom of speech versus public safety. The issue was the “heckler’s veto,” which takes place when audience members are so intentionally disruptive that they effectively prevent the speaker from speaking. Father Arthur Terminiello, a Roman Catholic priest who was an outspoken opponent of the Truman administration, gave an incendiary speech in a hall in Chicago, which the sponsors of the speech had rented for that purpose.
The speech delighted Terminiello’s supporters and infuriated his opponents. The opponents numbered about 1,600 people, and the supporters about 800. When it became apparent that violence might break out, the police ordered Terminiello to stop speaking and to leave the venue. When he disregarded their instructions, and the audience stormed and destroyed the podium, Terminiello was charged with and convicted of breach of the peace.
The Supreme Court reversed and held that the government cannot silence a speaker because it fears his words or the reaction of the audience. It also held that it is the duty of the government to protect speech, not to nullify or avoid it. In doing so, the court moved First Amendment jurisprudence significantly closer to where it is today -- an absolute protection for public political speech.
In 1969, the court articulated that protection when it held unanimously that all innocuous speech is absolutely protected and all speech is innocuous when there is time for more speech to challenge it. With notable exceptions like the cases of Daniel Ellsberg, Julian Assange and Edward Snowden, and the Patriot Act of 2001, that attitude generally prevailed in government in America.
Until now.
Earlier this month, the Department of Justice secured indictments of Americans and Russians for advancing “Russian propaganda” in America. The feds claim that articulating views of the war in Ukraine from a Russian perspective and holding out those views to be fact are somehow criminal.
These are political prosecutions. The effect of words is measured by their ability to be accepted in the marketplace of ideas, not whether they offend the government. The core purpose of the First Amendment is to keep the government out of the business of speech. That purpose protects the most caustic, incendiary and hateful speech hurled at the government, and admits no exceptions or prosecutions for content.
We are at the cusp of dark days for free expression. The remedy is to exercise it -- loudly, persistently and in the government’s face.
To learn more about Judge Andrew Napolitano, visit https://JudgeNap.com.
COPYRIGHT 2024 ANDREW P. NAPOLITANO
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM
Sample Questions:
- Judge, Eric Adams is being targeted by the Biden-Harris DOJ for exercising free speech in a political environment. Is this type of speech protected?
- If our speech is violated, even by the government, how can be certain that the Federal Courts will protect us in the end?
- The targeting of RT and foregin, Russian operatives by the DOJ is a joke. These foreign agents are never toughed by the Feds – so why to they put on these dog and pony shows to indict foreign actors – who will never have their day in a NY Court?
10:35 AM ET
Segment Topic:
The Hunt for Trump – Part II:
Yesterday, we were reminded that there is no shortage of enemies willing to assassinate Trump – given the opportunity. Even worse, the Secret Service knew of those threats prior to the assassination attempt in Butler PA on July 13th, that according to a preliminary, Senate Investigative Report just released.
Panelist:
None
Sample Questions:
- Do you believe that the Deep State knew of the threats against Trump’s life and deliberately permitted him to speak publicly with sub-standard security?
- Did our own intel agencies know of these internal and external threats and do nothing?
- Is Iran acting in concert with Deep State operatives or do you believe they are acting independently?
- Should Trump instruct Vance to retaliate and eliminate Iran’s oil production capabilities if he or anyone from his family, campaign or MAGA Nation are harmed?
11:10 AM ET
Segment Topic:
Dem-Coms retaliate against one of their own: Eric Adams, NYC Mayor!
The Dem-Coms are not afraid to target a critic in their own party. The indictment by the Biden/Harris DOJ is a warning to all Dem-Com mayors. Keep your mouth shut on the: Invasion of America or we will bring you down in a heartbeat!
It also sends another sign to the entire country that the Great Satan uses our domestic spying capabilities to build dossiers on everyone in government – regardless of party and use that intel to take them down when politically necessary.
Speaker Mike Johnson, an outspoken critic of the Patriot Act was in support of allowing the FISA Court Legislation to expire a few months ago – that is until he was visited by a group of Uni-Party communists. Shortly after that meeting, Johnson relented and signed on to renew Section 702 - the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
Panelist:
John Tobacco, Host of Wise Guys on Newsmax
Johnny T has predicted that Adams would be indicted for over a year. Will he be forced to resign?
Sample Questions:
- If the Dem-Coms are more than willing to take down one of their own – when politically necessary, do they not risk losing their grip on NYC politics?
- If the indictment is really political payback for Adams speaking out against the flooding of his City by illegals, what does tell other Blue City Mayors and Governors around the Country?
Community Guidelines
Thank you for being part of the DTDMedia Community. We value our producers and encourage an active participation by having everyone ask questions vote and chat. In order to keep the DTD Media Community and this platform engaging and respectful to all members we request all commenters adhere to our guidelines.
Respectful Debate: We encourage a variety of opinions and open debate but please refrain from using threatening language or making direct threats. Civil discourse is key.
Accuracy and Ownership: Ensure that your contributions are either factual or clearly presented as your own opinions. Posts containing illegal, discriminatory, offensive or misleading content will not be tolerated."
Use Real Names: For a better and more respectful experience we encourage participants to use their real names rather than nicknames. People tend to be more considerate when their identity is known.
Language: Please use English when posting comments or questions as this is the primary language of our event.
Stay On Topic: Keep discussions relevant to the event topic. If you have a different topic in mind please wait for an appropriate session or thread."
Question Submission: When asking questions please use the designated questions field and select the appropriate category from the dropdown menu. Do not add comments in the question field; they will be removed. All comments should be posted in the chat section.
Be Respectful: Engage in discussions with kindness and respect for others. Differences in opinion should be addressed with civility to maintain a constructive environment.
Avoid Negativity: If you encounter negativity or hostile behavior consider your response carefully. Engaging in a positive and constructive manner helps foster a better community."
Moderation: We reserve the right to moderate and remove comments that are abusive, spammy, off-topic, or otherwise inappropriate. Even partial violations may result in the removal of a post.
Reporting Issues: If you notice inappropriate content please report it to our moderation team at the following email address: Event.Moderator@WGMD.com. Include a direct link or reference to the specific session or chat where the issue occurred. While we may not respond to all reports individually please know that your concerns are reviewed and taken seriously.
By following these guidelines you contribute to a positive and enjoyable experience for everyone. Thank you for your cooperation and for making this event a success!